A Revolution Led by Mothers: Reshaping Academia
Mothers are at the forefront of a movement to change the rigid, outdated culture of academia, which often pushes them and other marginalized groups out of research and scientific careers. This push for change is driven by personal struggles and a desire to create a more inclusive and supportive environment for everyone in the academic community. The current academic system often operates on the myth of the "ideal academic," someone with a direct, uninterrupted career path. This view is deeply flawed and has serious consequences, as highlighted by the experience of social scientist Maria Carlotto in Brazil. When a reviewer for a federal funding agency, CNPq, stated that her pregnancies had hindered her career, it sparked outrage and a broader discussion about the rigid mindset in academia. This mindset is not just harmful to mothers; it also negatively impacts people with disabilities, chronic illnesses, and caring responsibilities. The fixation on a narrow idea of success can lead to burnout, mental health issues, and a mass exodus of promising talent. The struggle of mothers in academia is a global issue. The author, Fernanda Staniscuaski, a molecular biologist and mother of three, shares her own story of facing career setbacks after having her first child. She was denied grants because her productivity was unfairly compared to that of her peers who had not taken parental leave. Her career pauses were seen as impediments, nearly causing her to leave science entirely. This personal experience led her to found the Parent in Science Movement.
Concrete Changes and a Unified Front
The Parent in Science Movement has made significant progress in Brazil.
Recognition of Career Breaks: In 2021, a new field was added to Lattes, a database of Brazilian scientists' CVs, to officially recognize all types of career breaks, including maternity leave.
Career-Restart Grants: In 2023, a pioneering career-restart grant for mothers was launched in Rio de Janeiro. This initiative, a first in Brazil and Latin America, aims to support at least 21 mothers returning to their careers after a hiatus.
Reformed Evaluation Criteria: Following advocacy from the Parent in Science Movement, CNPq, the federal funding agency, adopted new maternity criteria for its committees. The evaluation period for scholarship applicants is now extended by two years for each childbirth or adoption, a major step forward. The agency also pledged to investigate further reports of prejudice.
These successes prove that advocacy can transform academia for the better. The movement is a powerful example of how individuals and groups affected by the hostile academic environment can unite to work toward a common goal.
To create lasting change, a unified front is essential. All academics and university administrators must challenge existing norms, engage in open dialogue, and recognize that people have lives and obligations outside of work. Funding bodies and institutions must also adapt their structures to be more flexible and supportive. This is the only way academia can attract and retain the talent it needs to thrive.
Original Article : https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00239-w
